The 1st 2 paragraphs have nothing to do with the book nor go even part of the way to set the context for the review proper that follows. This part of the review hangs by itself – a sort of polemic or the pet peeve of the reviewer.

The review itself is rather disjpinted – it doesn’t flow sermlessly ot coherently & themes taken up remain disjointed, staccato expressions of rudimentary ideas which fail to be developed in full.